R. Noguchi
To Win
S. Shimabukuro
To Win
Sho Shimabukuro vs Yan Bai Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L W L L L L L
Form
W W L W W W W L L WHead-2-Head: Shimabukuro 3 - 1 Bai
They have played 10 sets in total, with Shimabukuro winning 6 and Bai winning 4. The last match between Shimabukuro and Bai was at the Chengdu Open - Chengdu, 17-09-2024, Q1 round, Hard with Yan Bai getting the victory 1-6 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sho Shimabukuro | 3 |
| Yan Bai | 1 |
Chengdu Open - Chengdu(17-09-2024)
1
6
6
2
6
4
| Shimabukuro | Stats | Bai |
|---|---|---|
| 22% (2-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 67% (12-6) |
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 188 | Ranking | 244 |
| 135 | Highest Rank | 200 |
| 27 | Age | 35 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 6 | Titles | 28 |
| 61% (242-154) | Career Total W/L | 65% (425-231) |
| $282,005 | Career Prize Money | $53,505 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 3 | Hard H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Tien VS Giron PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Uchijima VS Montgomery PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shimabukuro VS Bai H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-6 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Yan Bai
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
7
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
30%
(
8 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
74
|
||||
| 3-6 7-6(3) 0-1 ret. |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Yan Bai
53%
(
41 of
77)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
88)
7
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
44 of
61)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
88)
77
Total Points Won
88
|
||||
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Yan Bai
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
| 6-1 6-3 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Yan Bai
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
90%
(
9 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
8 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
26
|
||||
Shimabukuro VS Bai H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 47 | Games Won | 38 |
| 21 | Aces (Total) | 21 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:43:32 | Average Match Time | 1:43:32 |
| 59% (156/263) | 1st Serve % | 64% (169/266) |
| 66% (103/156) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (116/169) |
| 60% (64/107) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (36/97) |
| 48% (13/27) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (9/22) |
| 43% (114/266) | Return Points Win % | 37% (96/263) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 67% (3/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 33% (3/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 33% (3/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sho Shimabukuro Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
50%
(
38 of
76)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kyrian Jacquet
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
48%
(
20 of
42)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacopo Berrettini
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
40 of
74)
3
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
5
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
69%
(
86 of
125)
1st Serve %
51%
(
54 of
106)
6
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
1
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
46%
(
57 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
106)
115
Total Points Won
116
|
1-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Antoine Escoffier
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
9
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
2-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
66%
(
62 of
94)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
97)
11
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
7
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
49 of
59)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
29 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
30 of
97)
95
Total Points Won
96
|
2-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Radu Albot
39%
(
19 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hady Habib
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve %
47%
(
30 of
64)
12
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
17%
(
11 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
23 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kaichi Uchida
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
59%
(
58 of
99)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
41%
(
41 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
86
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Yan Bai Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yan Bai
Player
Duckhee Lee
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sanhui Shin
Player
Yan Bai
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Oliver Crawford
Player
Yan Bai
66%
(
62 of
94)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
90)
2
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
95
|
7-6(5) 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Yan Bai
Player
Ye Cong Mo
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yan Bai
Player
Mikalai Haliak
70%
(
57 of
82)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
92
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yan Bai
Player
Artur Kukasian
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
10
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yan Bai
Player
Rigele Te
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve %
39%
(
17 of
44)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
96%
(
24 of
25)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
4 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Yan Bai
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yan Bai
Player
Ye Cong Mo
59%
(
49 of
83)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
83)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (242/154) | Win/Loss | 65% (425/231) |
| 58% (541/387) | Sets Win/Loss | 64% (913/524) |
| 53% (4776/4169) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (7213/5790) |
| 62% (180/110) | Hard Win/Loss | 66% (354/184) |
| 61% (17/11) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (47/32) |
| 55% (32/26) | Indoor Hard W/L | 64% (21/12) |
| 65% (13/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) |
| 0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1499 | Aces Total | 1393 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 1065 | Total Double Faults | 831 |
| 1:31:7 | Average Match Time | 1:1:24 |
| 275.93 | Average Opponent Rank | 551.05 |
| 56% (14185/25279) | 1st Serve % | 60% (16339/27040) |
| 70% (9999/14185) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (11142/16339) |
| 51% (5706/11094) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5433/10701) |
| 44% (1103/2483) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1437/3207) |
| 40% (10112/25285) | Return Points Win % | 43% (12035/27962) |
| 56% (9/7) | Slam W/L | 29% (2/5) |
| 33% (1/2) | Masters W/L | 25% (2/6) |
| 50% (2/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 37% (7/12) | Main Tour W/L | 25% (3/9) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (84/66) | Challenger W/L | 50% (98/97) |
| 68% (139/65) | Futures W/L | 74% (319/113) |
| 61% (237/386) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (414/620) |
| 50% (4/8) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 27% (3/11) |
| 43% (64/150) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (83/155) |
| 56% (73/130) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (82/144) |
| 86% (237/205) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (414/375) |
| 13% (237/31) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (414/37) |
| 23% (159/36) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (238/52) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
